Plainfield Trash Facts

Source documentArchived PDF with searchable plain text and original-source attribution.Document archive →

SMART Technology Systems, LLC - source document

SMART Response to DEEP's Waste Infrastructure Request for Information

SMART Technology Systems, LLC document preserved in the Plainfield Trash Facts evidence record, with an archived PDF, searchable text, and a direct link to the original publisher.

Issued by
SMART Technology Systems, LLC
Document date
Not stated
Length
6 pages
Archived file
180 KB

The first pages and searchable text are presented together. On phones, the text follows the page images. The archived PDF remains the controlling source.

Archived PDF preview

Page 1 preview of SMART Response to DEEP's Waste Infrastructure Request for Information
Page 1 of 6 - select to open the PDF
Page 2 preview of SMART Response to DEEP's Waste Infrastructure Request for Information
Page 2 of 6 - select to open the PDF

Accessible version

Plain-text transcript

Generated by layout-aware native PDF text extraction. Tables, maps, columns, and symbols may not translate perfectly.

[Page 1]

PUBLIC
                         RESPONSE TO
  Connecticut Department of Energy & Environmental Protection
           Connecticut Materials Management Infrastructure
                    Request for Information
Relative to materials management infrastructure- including disposal infrastructure,
recycling infrastructure, and composting infrastructure- to meet the goals of the 2023
Draft Comprehensive Materials Management Strategy Amendment to improve
diversion of municipal solid waste for recycling and regaining self-sufficiency in
managing municipal solid waste disposal within Connecticut’s borders.

[Page 2]

2

                                   THE PROBLEM

       Connecticut is facing major problems with inadequate statewide
processing capacity to take care of its municipal solid waste. The existing systems
handling municipal solid waste in Connecticut are waste projects which utilize
“Mass Burn” systems. All of them were developed in response to an archaic
system of handling garbage in Connecticut which relied on inefficient burning of
garbage and use of landfills. These projects, developed between 1985 and 1990,
are now old and highly polluting. They do not meet the lower emissions of state-
of-the art modern technologies.
       The existing plants were all developed utilizing special laws which provided
for creation of Resource Recovery Authorities in conjunction with municipalities.
The “Authorities” were able to develop Resource Recovery Facilities which were
designed to receive unprocessed Municipal Solid Waste (MSW), perform some
recycling and burn the remainder to create electricity. The ash created by the
burning of the MSW was then placed in landfill systems.
       The statute creating the Resource Recovery Authorities allowed these
entities to issue bonds used for the financing of the development of the projects.
The statute also allowed these facilities to enter into long-term electricity contracts
with Connecticut utility companies at preferred rates. The electricity revenue
contracts enabled the Resource Recovery Authorities to pay off the bonded debt
and were usually tied to the term of the bonds issued by the Authority. At the time
the initial laws were enacted this solution was a major improvement over previous
methods of handling Connecticut’s garbage.
       Some improvements were implemented to improve waste handling mostly
dealing with increasing the amount of recycling at each Resource Recovery
Facility.  As concerns about polluting emissions created by the burning of the
MSW increased, there was little or no implementation of technological
methods to take care of these problems. Concerns about the landfilling of ash
from the facilities also made it difficult to be able to permit much needed new
landfills. No solutions were provided for capture and conversion of CO2 emissions.
       The decision to close the MIRA facility in Hartford after a number of
attempts to replace the facility failed has resulted in the current situation which has
forced many Connecticut municipalities to transport their MSW out of state to
landfills located in Pennsylvania and Ohio.
       The most current Connecticut waste-to-energy information (2021) provides
a snapshot of how MSW was handled prior to the closing of the MIRA facility in

     SMART Technology Systems, LLC “Public Response” to Connecficut DEEP CMMS Request for
                           Informafion with confidenfial material redacted.

[Page 3]

3

Hartford in 2022. The annual MSW capacity was almost 2,200,000 tons at the five
resource recovery plants. Actual MSW in the 2021 time period was just under
1,900,000 tons. With the closing of the MIRA plant in Hartford, more than 700,000
tons of MSW capacity was terminated.

     Data provided from        U.S. Energy Information Administration and U.S.
                            Environmental Protection Agency

                    Connecticut’s Waste to Energy Projects (2021)

       While the four remaining resource recovery projects continue operations,
only a portion of MIRA’s waste processing was taken over by these plants. The
balance - in excess of 500,000 tons per year is now being shipped to landfills in
Pennsylvania and Ohio.  The remaining four Resource Recovery Facilities
located in Bridgeport, Bristol, Lisbon and Preston are operating at maximum
capacity but still using older, polluting technology. These remaining projects are all
in excess of 30 years old. All of them will require substantial expenditures to be
able to meet current environmental standards.  All of them are using waste burning
technology which produces         substantial CO2, Methane and Nitrogen Oxides.
                 Connecticut’s Waste to Energy Projects Emissions

     SMART Technology Systems, LLC “Public Response” to Connecficut DEEP CMMS Request for
                          Informafion with confidenfial material redacted.

[Page 4]

4

                          THE SMART SOLUTION
       There is a solution available to the State of Connecticut which can provide a
positive, environmentally friendly solution to Connecticut’s waste problem. That
solution includes intense recycling coupled with waste diversion and clean,
efficient, low emissions power generation. This approach will greatly improve
Connecticut’s environment and provide new MSW capacity and jobs. Simple to
implement, with minor changes to existing legislation, this alternative approach
can also help stabilize electrical prices for Connecticut consumers and save
ratepayers millions of dollars. That solution is called SMART Technology
Systems.
       These are the key methods that the SMART SOLUTION uses:
  -   Implementation of “world class” modern recycling methods.
  -   Recycling of 99% of metals, 98% of glass and preparation of “Refuse
      Designed Fuel”.
  -   Inclusion of anaerobic digestive systems as part of the waste processing
      system.
  -   Utilization of proven “gasification technology” in place of “waste burning
      technology”.
  -   Production of Class 1 Baseload electricity using “synthesis gas” and steam
      cycle as well as “biogas” and fuel cell technologies for energy conversion.
  -   Use of carbon capture technology to reduce air emissions including CO2 plus
      conversion into “food grade” CO2.
  -   Beneficial reuse of cleaner ash residues for use in cement and other products.
  -   Increase landfill diversion rates to reduce landfill use as much as possible.
  -   Tipping fee stabilization.

       THE SMART SOLUTION WILL IMPLEMENT & ACHIEVE THE
FOLLOWING GOALS:
   -   Connecticut has established a comprehensive material management strategy
       and solid waste plan which includes aggressive recycling goals. SMART’s
       project helps Connecticut meet its recycling goals. SMART’s                technology
       package can help Connecticut increase recycling and lower emissions.
   -   SMART Waste Processing System uses proven “gasification technology” in
       place of “burn technology” to convert refuse derived fuel to a cleaner
       synthesis gas/ lower greenhouse gas which should qualify as a Class I
       energy source.

     SMART Technology Systems, LLC “Public Response” to Connecficut DEEP CMMS Request for
                          Informafion with confidenfial material redacted.

[Page 5]

5

   -   The SMART technology converts/recycles plastics to a clean renewable gas
       while meeting emissions goals.
   -   SMART      technology will reduce a significant amount of CO2 while diverting
       million tons of waste from landfills and produce clean, base load electricity
       on a 24 x 7 basis.
   -   SMART      uses technology with proven track records and best-in-class
       emission performance. Our projects will provide high capacity, high
       recycling rate, and a high landfill diversion rate, all within a small footprint
       while holding costs down for Connecticut residents.  This approach will
       modernize MSW processing capacity and production of renewable energy
       with a high-capacity factor (>90%).
   -   The SMART approach also provides a carbon dioxide capture and
       conversion system to achieve maximum emissions reduction.
   -   Using minor modifications to existing statutes SMART’s approach can help
       stabilize tipping fees in Connecticut.
   -   The SMART systems are based upon extremely adaptive technologies that
       will facilitate the integration of next-generation upgrades as they become
       available.
   -   The SMART solution will confirm Connecticut’s position as a national
       leader in addressing the MSW challenge.

       SUGGESTED REQUIRED DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA ELEMENTS
       Based on our review of Connecticut’s laws and policies we have evolved a
list of development criteria to be applied to any waste processing projects:
       1)  PROJECT LOCATION- All proposed projects should be located away
           from major urban and residential areas. Those projects proposed to be
           located in environmental justice communities should be physically
           located so as to have little or no impact on those communities.
       2)  PROJECT SIZE AND TYPE: Proposed projects should be sized to
           achieve maximum environmental and recycling benefits. It is suggested
           that wherever possible municipal solid waste processing systems be
           developed in locations with anaerobic processing systems in proximity to
           minimize transportation of waste. Recycling technology on these
           properties should be designed to facilitate separation of anaerobic waste
           packages from MSW for onsite processing for organic wastes.

     SMART Technology Systems, LLC “Public Response” to Connecficut DEEP CMMS Request for
                          Informafion with confidenfial material redacted.

[Page 6]

6

  3) TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS: It is imperative that proposed
     projects be located in proximity to existing railroad and highway systems
     for delivery of waste and also for shipping of materials to be recycled.
  4) EMISSION REDUCTION SYSTEMS: Emission reduction and
     conversion needs to be an integral part of all future waste processing
     systems to achieve important environmental goals, including carbon
     dioxide reduction.
  5) PROVEN GASIFICATION SYSTEMS: Clean gasification systems
     which convert refuse derived fuel into a cleaner synthesis gas with lower
     greenhouse gas impacts should qualify as a Class I Renewable Energy
     source as anaerobic digestion biogas does under current CMMS
     standards.
  6) TOTAL INTEGRATED PACKAGE: The total integrated recycling and
     renewable energy conversion facility should qualify as a low emissions
     advanced renewable energy conversion facility as defied in the
     Connecticut Renewable Energy Portfolio Standard.
  7) PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN: It is suggested that the State of
     Connecticut evolve its Comprehensive             Materials Management
     Strategy (CMMS) for development and implementation of new waste
     processing projects and evolve a cost-effective funding mechanism for
     these projects. The funding mechanism should include additional long-
     term financing for implementation of new technical improvements to be
     implemented at these projects as they evolve. As existing waste to energy
     facilities need to be replaced, the CMMS will be able to provide new
     projects. These will become permanent waste processing projects to meet
     Connecticut’s needs going forward and achieve the waste processing and
     environmental benefits in a cost-effective manner.

SMART Technology Systems, LLC “Public Response” to Connecficut DEEP CMMS Request for
                    Informafion with confidenfial material redacted.

Original publisher: https://portal.ct.gov/-/media/deep/waste_management_and_disposal/solid_waste_management_plan/wasteinfrastructurerfi/smart-tech-systems.pdf