Plainfield Trash Facts

Source documentArchived PDF with searchable plain text and original-source attribution.Document archive →

United Kingdom Without Incineration Network - source document

Gasification Failures in the United Kingdom

United Kingdom Without Incineration Network document preserved in the Plainfield Trash Facts evidence record, with an archived PDF, searchable text, and a direct link to the original publisher.

Issued by
United Kingdom Without Incineration Network
Document date
November 2016
Length
8 pages
Archived file
874 KB

The first pages and searchable text are presented together. On phones, the text follows the page images. The archived PDF remains the controlling source.

Archived PDF preview

Page 1 preview of Gasification Failures in the United Kingdom
Page 1 of 8 - select to open the PDF
Page 2 preview of Gasification Failures in the United Kingdom
Page 2 of 8 - select to open the PDF

Accessible version

Plain-text transcript

Generated by layout-aware native PDF text extraction. Tables, maps, columns, and symbols may not translate perfectly.

[Page 1]

UNITED KINGDOM WITHOUT
 INCINERATION NETWORK

              UKWIN BRIEFING

GASIFICATION FAILURES IN THE UK:
 BANKRUPTCIES AND ABANDONMMENT

                                    November 2016
                          http://ukwin.org.uk/resources/

[Page 2]

INTRODUCTION

 The United Kingdom Without Incineration Network (UKWIN) is a network of around
 100 campaign groups opposing waste incineration. This provides the organisation
 with an overview of the gasification and pyrolysis sector, alongside intimate                       and
 detailed knowledge of numerous incineration proposals and waste companies.

 Promoters  of  gasification  and  pyrolysis          schemes,  sometimes  collectively  called
 "Advanced  Thermal Treatment"             schemes,     regularly  make  bold  claims  about  the
 technological, environmental and financial performance of their proposed facilities
 with  a  mixed  waste  feedstock.  In  reality,  where  such  configurations  have  been
 attempted they have either failed to live up to these claims or                    operators remain
 suspiciously quiet about reporting actual performance.

 Because companies do not like to talk about their failures it is often hard to find out
 what went wrong. For example, Air Products remain tight-lipped about the serious
 high-profile problems they encountered at Tees Valley.

 Would-be operators frequently point to existing and emerging demonstrator plants,
 declaring that they are proposing the same in an attempt to make their proposal
 sound deliverable, but as soon as the plants they cite start to fail (e.g. Isle of Wight,
 Dargavel, Avonmouth, Tees Valley) these companies suddenly try to explain how
 their proposal could not be more dissimilar to the failed projects from which they had
 previously tried to draw credibility.

 Gasification and pyrolysis constitute some of             the riskiest technologies in the waste
 industry and are synonymous with bankruptcies, failures and broken promises. This
 perception is well deserved, with the lack of examples of success starkly contrasting
 with a litany of failures.

 This briefing provides some information about the following gasification and pyrolysis
 projects and companies:

      -   Air Products' Tees Valley Projects
      -   Ascot Environmental and its Subsidiary Scotgen
      -   BCB Environmental
      -   Bioflame
      -   Biossence Renewable Energy
      -   Caithness Heat And Power
      -   Clean Power Properties
      -   Compact Power Holdings
      -   Energos
      -   Interserve
      -   New Earth Solutions

 UKWIN Briefing: Gasification Failures in the UK                                                  Page 1

[Page 3]

AIR PRODUCTS' TEES VALLEY PROJECTS

 In 2012, Waste2Tricity (who were involved in the Tees Valley projects) stated: "Air
 Products are the pathfinder in this sea change of energy conversion technologies".1

 Air Products, a Fortune 500 company with significant capital,2 failed to overcome the
 technological difficulties they faced with their Tees Valley gasification projects even
 after spending a billion dollars on the technology.

 Air Products' April 2016 decision to abandon the thermal treatment market calls into
 question the viability of using gasification technology with a mixed waste feedstock.

 In April 2014 the UK Government announced that: "…The new 20 year [Tees Valley
 gasification] contract with Air Products, worth 2% of government’s energy spend, is
 expected to deliver £84 million in savings over the life of the contract through an
 innovative fixed agreement that will provide stability in what the public sector pays for
 energy…Air Products has longstanding expertise in building and operating large,
 complex industrial gas and energy plants ensuring its projects are delivered safely,
 reliably and cost-effectively".3

 In October 2015 Air Products' CEO stated that: "We have always said that there is a
 chance that the technology  will not  work…so we are still  working to figure out
 whether it does work or not… There's a good chance that it doesn't work, so we have
 to be aware of that and I have been mentioning that for the past year."4

 In January 2016 Air Products' CEO              explained: "...we're in an iterative process of
 trying to learn how the gasifier behaves and if we can make it work on a sustainable
 basis. There is a still significant outstanding question about if we will ever be able to
 get it to work on a sustainable basis. And as I said, we have given ourselves a few
 months to keep trying it, but there will come a time that we might stop trying. The
 technology is proving to be a lot more difficult than people thought at the beginning
 and I have to say we haven't made a lot of significant progress since we talked to
 you last time"5

 In the end, Air Products gave up on their Tees Valley gasification                    projects  due to
 what they called "design and operational challenges".6                  It was reported that:       "Air
 Products…announced that the Company will exit its Energy-from-Waste business.
 As a result…Air Products expects to record a pre-tax charge in the range of $900
 million to $1.0 billion in discontinued operations, primarily to  write down assets
 associated with the EfW business…"7

 According to a waste trade press article: "…Tees Valley could be remembered as
 one of the most expensive waste infrastructure blunders in years. Frustrating for all
 those involved – and embarrassing for the UK government, which was looking to Air
 Products to provide power on behalf of its Energy for Growth programme over a 20-
 year fixed period…"8

 UKWIN Briefing: Gasification Failures in the UK                                                  Page 2

[Page 4]

ASCOT ENVIRONMENTAL AND ITS SUBSIDIARY SCOTGEN

 In  May  2012  it  was  reported  that:        "A  firm  that  struck  a  deal  to  build  multiple
 renewable energy projects across the country has said it is to file for administration.
 Ascot Environmental carried out civil engineering and gasification work on waste
 treatment plants at numerous sites including at Bristol and Essex, working with
 waste   disposal   giant   SITA   and   property   management   company   Cyclamax
 Holdings."9

 "The waste-to-energy plant [Scotgen's Dargavel gasification plant] opened in August,
 2009, but has been bedevilled with problems. To date, it has failed to produce
 energy.  It  previously  had      a  contract  with  part  of  a  group  of  companies  called
 Waste2Energy, which went into administration and left a £600,000 trail of debt in the
 Dumfries area."10

 "Scotgen (Dumfries) Ltd has seen its permit to operate the Dargavel energy                      -from-
 waste  plant  revoked       by  the  Scottish  Environmental  Protection  Agency  (SEPA)
 following its failure to ‘comply with the requirements of the permit’…The revocation
 notice…was issued for the following reasons: Persistent non                  -compliance with the
 requirements of the permit; Failure         to comply with an enforcement notice; Failure to
 maintain financial provision and resources to comply with the requirements of the
 permit; and Failure to recover energy with a high level of efficiency."11

BCB ENVIRONMENTAL

 In August 2010 it was reported that: "…BCB Environmental…entered administration
 just three months after it pledged to appeal a decision blocking its proposal to build a
 £24 million waste-to-energy gasification facility in Tockwith."12

BIOFLAME

 In December 2010 it was announced that:             "Bioflame has developed its own patented
 partial-gasification technology − an advanced thermal treatment process…"13

 Less than a year later, it was reported that:             "…Bioflame      ceased trading after its
 funding was pulled...It secured the investment in December 2010 to complete the
 commercialisation  of  the  company’s  technology,  attract  project  funding,  and
 accelerate  the  rollout  of  projects.  But  the  funder  pulled  out  after  invest          ing  £3
 million…"14

BIOSSENCE RENEWABLE ENERGY

 Biossence  was  "established  in  2006  to  develop  and  deliver  renewable  energy
 projects".15   However, the      Biossence      gasification project failed      despite millions of
 pounds of pledged investment from the London Waste and Recycling Board and the
 company entered into administration in March 2014.16

 UKWIN Briefing: Gasification Failures in the UK                                                 Page 3

[Page 5]

CAITHNESS HEAT AND POWER

 "From 2002, Highland Council embarked on a biomass project in Wick: They would
 build a combined heat and power plant which would use residues from nearby tree
 plantations to heat local housing and sell electricity to the grid. Few would fault the
 idea…When technical problems became apparent, Highland Council took full control
 of the scheme. Trials were started in October 2008 but by December that year, an
 expert report advised that the [gasification] plant would never work..."17

 The  Scottish  public  sector  auditor,  Audit  Scotland,  decided  to  carry  out  a  full
 investigation into how Highland Council had lost £11.5 million and issued a highly
 critical report, which stated: "…Ultimately, the project failed because the company
 procured ‘experimental’ and high risk gasification technology which could not be
 commissioned successfully…”18

CLEAN POWER PROPERTIES

 In May 2012 Clean Power Properties (CPP) boasted about their plans for more than
 a  dozen    gasification   projects,  but  to  date  not  a  single  facility  has  secured  the
 necessary environmental permit, and there are no signs of any of their proposed
 facilities being built. CPP has suffered a series of setbacks, for example:

    -   Cwmgwili,    South West Wales          - CPP’s planning application was refused in
        February 2016, and CPP did not appeal.
    -   Micheldever  Station,  Hampshire          –  CPP  withdrew  their  planning  appeal  in
        October 2015.
    -   Washwood Heath, Birmingham              –  CPP withdrew their        environmental permit
        application in May 2015.
    -   Thames   Haven,   Thurrock          –   CPP   withdrew   their   environmental   permit
        application in December 2014.
    -   Eastleigh, Hampshire – CPP withdrew their environmental permit application in
        November 2014.
    -   Castleford,  West  Yorkshire       –   CPP’s  planning  application  for  an  amended
        scheme  was  refused  in  June  2014.  CPP  subsequently  withdrew  their
        environmental permit application in November 2014.
    -   Brierley Hill, Dudley    – CPP withdrew their planning appeal in May 2014. CPP
        withdrew their environmental permit application in November 2014.
    -   Leeds   – CPP was refused planning permission in March 2014. The applicant
        appealed in October 2014, but days before evidence was due to be submitted,
        Clean Power Properties withdrew their appeal. CPP subsequently withdrew
        their environmental permit application in November 2014.

 UKWIN Briefing: Gasification Failures in the UK                                                Page 4

[Page 6]

COMPACT POWER HOLDINGS

 "Description of business: Development and exploitation of Company's proprietary
 technology for the processing of waste by advanced thermal conversion using the
 processes of pyrolysis, gasification and high temperature oxidation."19

 In February 2011 it was reported that: "Avonmouth-based Compact Power Holdings
 has entered liquidation...Compact Power Holdings was established in 1992 with the
 aim of becoming a         leading business in the renewable energy and environmental
 sector. However, in 2008, a number of companies within the group were placed into
 administration. This resulted in the loss of investors’ cash totalling almost £20m."                20

ENERGOS

 In  July 2016     it was reported that: "Gasification technology supplier Energos has
 entered administration, citing cash flow issues caused by contractual disputes on two
 of its major contracts"21 and that: "Energos’s entry into administration is the latest in
 a series of issues for gasification companies in the UK this year"22                   and that: "The
 company’s   business   was   based   primarily   around   providing   services   and
 technologies…via   a   process   known   as   gasification.               Prior   to   its   entry   into
 administration, Energos had been contracted to construct four separate waste plants
 in Glasgow, Milton Keynes, Derby and on the Isle of Wight. However, administrators
 have explained that the company found itself faced with serious cash flow problems
 as  a  result  of  disputes  with  two  of  its  main  contractors."23             According  to  the
 administrators, the cash flow issues arose from Energos' failure to deliver on their
 gasification contracts.24

INTERSERVE

 In August 2016 it was reported that: "Construction firm Interserve has announced
 that  it  is  leaving  the  energy-from-waste  (EfW)  industry  months  after  revealing
 complications  with  on-going          [gasification]   projects  had  cost  the  company  £70
 million…In May, the firm confirmed that design, procurement and installation issues
 at  Viridor’s   planned  gasification  plant  in  Glasgow  had  led  to  ‘deterioration’  in
 Interserve’s contract, prompting a £70 million contract provision being imposed on
 the company."25

 UKWIN Briefing: Gasification Failures in the UK                                                   Page 5

[Page 7]

NEW EARTH SOLUTIONS

 New  Earth  Solutions,  New  Earth  Energy,  and  New  Earth  Advanced  Thermal
 technology (NEAT) are associated with several failed gasification projects.

 The NEAT gasification facility in Canford, Dorset was to have processed 8,000
 tonnes a year of Solid Recovered Fuel (SRF) but was shut down in 2012.26                           The
 larger (100,000 tonne per annum) gasification facility built in Avonmouth, Bristol
 never operated as New Earth Solutions had expected, and the company abandoned
 the facility in 2014.27      New Earth is also associated with abandoned gasification
 projects in Easter Langlee (Scottish Borders), Hooton Park (Merseyside), Winfrith
 (Dorset), and Blaise Farm (Kent).

 The company told shareholders in July 2015 that: "…the level of performance has
 consistently   fallen   well   short   of   targeted   levels.   The   programme   of   works
 communicated  in  March,  whilst  undertaken,  has  proven  to  be  unsuccessful.
 Operational, manpower, maintenance and repair costs have consistently proved to
 be much higher than originally planned. In April, New Earth engaged an external
 engineering consultancy to carry out a further            technical and financial review on the
 future potential for the ERF        [gasification]  Plant. The consequence of this review is
 that further essential and significant capital expenditure has been identified in order
 to  potentially  improve  the  ERF  Plant’s  performance.  Based  on  history,  this
 programme will still carry substantial technical risk…as with all technology there is
 often a steep learning curve and sometimes a high degree of uncertainty as to the
 outcome and these have unfortunately been amply demonstrat                   ed in the performance
 of the ERF to date…"28

 In  June  2016  it  was  reported  that:  "       New  Earth  Solutions  Group  has  entered
 administration…The announcement is likely to concern a number of local authorities
 that have contracts with New Earth, which operates five waste plants at Avonmouth
 near  Bristol,  Canford  in  Dorset,  Sharpness  in  Gloucestershire,  Cotesbach  in
 Leicestershire and Blaise in Kent…"29

 And in July 2016 it was reported that: "Creditors to the New Earth Solutions Group
 are likely to miss out on over £9 million after the waste management company was
 sold out of administration.       A report issued by the company’s administrator Duff &
 Phelps  to  its  260  creditors  explains  that  £9,169,521  is  owed,  with  no  hope  of
 repayment…"30

 Investigative journalism blog        http://notjustsheepandrugby.blogspot.co.uk/            has been
 looking into New Earth Solutions and how Scottish Borders Council became one of
 the many victims of the company's failure to deliver. The more information that
 comes to light, through Freedom of Information and other means, the clearer it is that
 the Council should never have relied upon the company's unproven gasification
 technology to treat their waste. The failed Easter Langlee gasification project cost
 Scottish Borders Council at least £2.4 million pounds with nothing to show for it.               31

 UKWIN Briefing: Gasification Failures in the UK                                                 Page 6

[Page 8]

SOURCES

 1 http://www.waste2tricity.com/dl/w2t-gives-vote-of-confidence-to-air-products.pdf
 2 http://www.airproducts.com/Company/news-center/2016/04/0404-air-products-will-exit-energy-
 from-waste-business.aspx
 3 https://www.gov.uk/government/news/new-energy-deal-to-save-84m-from-government-bill

 4  http://seekingalpha.com/article/3620496-air-products-and-chemicals-apd-seifollah-ghasemi-
 q4-2015-results-earnings-call-transcript?part=single
 5 http://seekingalpha.com/article/3849046-air-products-chemicals-apd-ceo-seifi-ghasemi-q1-
 2016-results-earnings-call-transcript?part=single
 6 http://www.airproducts.com/Company/news-center/2016/04/0404-air-products-will-exit-
 energy-from-waste-business.aspx
 7 http://www.airproducts.com/Company/news-center/2016/04/0404-air-products-will-exit-energy-
 from-waste-business.aspx
 8 http://www.letsrecycle.com/news/latest-news/air-products-what-happens-now/
 9 http://www.mrw.co.uk/news/waste-to-energy-firm-to-file-for-administration/8630500.article
 10 http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/local-news/ownership-scotgen-firm-changes-hands-2409918
 11 http://resource.co/article/Waste_Law/Scotgen_permit_revoked_after_series_breaches-3554
 12http://www.letsrecycle.com/news/latest-news/waste-management/bcb-environmental-enters-
 administration
 13 http://www.theengineer.co.uk/news/esb-novusmodus-to-invest-up-to-45m-in-
 bioflame/1006435.article
 14 http://www.gazetteherald.co.uk/news/9288356.Pickering_firm_goes_into_liquidation/
 15 http://www.wirral.gov.uk/planning/Docs/DMZfiles/23050_2.pdf
 16 http://www.endswasteandbioenergy.com/article/1286280/uk-east-london-wte-project-enters-
 administration
 17 http://www.biofuelwatch.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/Biomass-gasification-and-pyrolysis-
 formatted-full-report.pdf
 18 http://www.audit-scotland.gov.uk/docs/local/2010/sr_100624_chaps.pdf & http://www.audit-
 scotland.gov.uk/docs/local/2014/sr_140109_chap.pdf
 19 http://www.londonstockexchange.com/exchange/prices-and-markets/stocks/new-and-recent-
 issues/new-recent-issue-details.html?issueId=560
 20 http://www.insidermedia.com/insider/south-west/46919-
 21 http://www.letsrecycle.com/news/latest-news/energos-enters-administration-over-cash-flow/
 22 http://resource.co/article/another-setback-gasification-sector-incineration-specialist-enters-
 administration-11238
 23 http://www.realbusinessrescue.co.uk/company-administration/clean-energy-company-based-in-
 warrington-enters-administration-after-cash-flow-crisis
 24 13 Sep 2016 "Statement of administrator's proposal" available from:
 https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/03109022/filing-history
 25 http://resource.co/article/interserve-quitting-unique-challenges-energy-waste-industry-11299
 26 https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/195254/response/
 487012/attach/4/Gasification%20of%20MSW.pdf
 27 http://www.premiernewearthfund.com/cms/documents/NERR%20-
 %20Letter%20to%20shareholders%20%2024%207%2015%20%20(2).pdf
 28 http://www.premiernewearthfund.com/cms/documents/NERR%20-
 %20Letter%20to%20shareholders%20%2024%207%2015%20%20(2).pdf
 29 http://www.letsrecycle.com/news/latest-news/breakdown-of-talks-lands-new-earth-in-
 administration/
 30 http://resource.co/article/9-million-go-unpaid-new-earth-solutions-investors-11254
 31 http://notjustsheepandrugby.blogspot.co.uk/2015/07/fall-out-from-avonmouth-fire-sale.html

 UKWIN Briefing: Gasification Failures in the UK                                                          Page 7

Original publisher: https://www.ukwin.org.uk/files/pdf/UKWIN_Gasification_Failures_Briefing.pdf